Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Malak El Allami vs Carolina Kuhl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Allami vs Kuhl analysis and find out who is favored!
Malak El Allami vs Carolina Kuhl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Allami 0 - 0 Kuhl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Allami has won 46.64% of points on their second serve, while Kuhl has won 46.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Allami, in recent form, has won 50.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kuhl has won 61.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.38% and 43.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Allami has saved 54.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuhl has saved 46.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Allami has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Kuhl winning 58.33% (W/L 35/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Allami has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Allami has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 7/ 7), where as Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Allami has played against opponents with an average rank of 97.13 while Kuhl has played against players with an average rank of 306.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Allami has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuhl has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Allami has converted 50.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuhl has converted 56.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
504
Rank
396
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
41% (14-20)
Career Total W/L
60% (59-40)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
58% (21-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Malak El Allami vs Carolina Kuhl For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Allami VS Kuhl
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Malak El Allami | Carolina Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 58% (21/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 59% (47/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (58/57) | 56% (396/313) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:16 | 1:42:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.8 | 273.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (201/381) | 63% (1425/2273) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (123/201) | 61% (874/1425) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (86/180) | 46% (391/848) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (22/38) | 57% (176/311) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (155/348) | 50% (1144/2305) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 60% (21/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 83% (23/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 17% (23/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Malak El Allami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Malak El Allami
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Malak El Allami
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
41%
(
39 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Tian Jialin
44%
(
31 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Michika Ozeki
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Malak El Allami
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malak El Allami
Player
Yanan Hou
55%
(
63 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
86 of
116)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
86)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Carolina Kuhl
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Anali Kocevar
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
44%
(
27 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Melisa Ercan
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Viola Turini
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Allami Vs Kuhl Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Allami are available here and Kuhl photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carolina Kuhl
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
